More For Your Money: How The Oregon Health Fund Board's Draft Health Reform Plan Reins In Skyrocketing Health Care Costs
2008-09-30
Executive Summary
Oregon
businesses and consumers are facing unsustainable increases health insurance
premiums and out-of-pocket costs, with health care costs rising at more than
double the rate of inflation.
Given
this, Oregon officials are developing a major health reform plan to cut costs,
improve health outcomes, and ensure Oregonians have access to affordable
quality health care.
The
officials charged with this task, the Oregon Health Fund Board, released a
draft reform plan for public comment in early September 2008. The Board will
release a final proposal in November, and the Oregon Legislature is expected to
consider it in the 2009 session.
Key Findings
•
The Oregon Health Fund Board's draft plan's consumer-friendly
cost containment provisions have the potential to cut health care costs an
estimated $5.4 billion over ten years.
•
Strengthening the plan's provisions to cut waste, improve smart
use of technology, boost purchasing power and watchdog insurance and hospital
rates would result in even greater savings, helping further stabilize costs for
businesses, taxpayers and consumers.
•
The draft plan proposes cutting costs – not by cutting care –
but through three consumer-friendly strategies: cutting waste in the health
care system, boosting Oregon
consumers' and taxpayers' ability to leverage purchasing power to negotiate
better deals, and by strengthening the state's role to watchdog excessive
health care costs:
Cutting Waste: Consumer-friendly Cost Containment
One
key area where Oregon
can cut health care costs is through cost control methods that maintain or even
improve the
quality of care. This type of cost-containment systematically cuts waste, makes
smart use of new technology and clinical models, and uses prevention to keep
people healthy.
Cutting
Drug Costs – Require
health plans purchased with public dollars to use the Oregon drug purchasing pool unless the
health plan got a better deal on prescription drugs. Estimated potential savings: $1.6-6.3 million in 2009
and $24-95 million over 10 years. Quality impact: Neutral
Administrative
Simplification –
Develop and require standard electronic formats for eligibility,
claims, payments, etc. Estimated potential savings: $400 million over 10
years. Quality impact: Neutral
The
Best Primary Care, an "Integrated Health Home"
– Shift
to this proven method of care where teams of health providers center care on
each patient, focusing on prevention, early detection and disease management
methods. Estimated potential savings: $50 million in the first
year and $2.5 billion over 10 years* Quality impact: Quality improves
Health
Information Technology – Help health providers more
quickly incorporate the best health information technology into their
practices, and use the technology to deliver better care and communicate
information to other providers caring for the same patient. Doing so would
increase short-term health care spending in Oregon, but result in net savings in the
long term. Estimated potential savings: $990 million over 10
years* Quality impact: Quality improves Estimated potential savings if health IT achieves
widespread use: $1 billion per year in 12 years.
Keeping
Healthy to Prevent Disease – Invest in proven programs to
cut smoking and obesity. Estimated potential savings: $32 million in the first
year and $1.7 billion over 10 years. Quality impact: Health outcomes improve
Unifying Consumer and Taxpayer Purchasing Power
In
addition to initiatives to directly reform the health care system, the Board's
plan recommends harnessing market forces to reduce costs. The plan proposes
methods to help purchasers of health care and health insurance negotiate better
prices, and to drive out waste and improve quality in the health care system.
The plan proposes to do this in two ways. First, it establishes a public
employers health cooperative which would strengthen the purchasing power of
state and local government entities to save taxpayer dollars. Second, it
unifies the purchasing power of individuals, and potentially small businesses,
through the Oregon Health Insurance Exchange, a purchasing pool designed to
negotiate lower rates and better coverage. Ultimately, these purchasing pools
could partner to create greater savings and choices through combined purchasing
power.
Watchdog Insurance Administrative Rates
A
third key area the Board includes in its draft plan is in the area of
regulatory oversight. Aimed at eliminating excessive insurance administrative
costs, the draft report recommends the Legislature authorize the Insurance
Division to develop standards for reviewing the administrative portion of
health insurance rates. Estimated potential savings: $735 million over 10
years Impact on quality: Neutral
The
draft report also recommends an appropriate agency be charged with setting
ceilings on the rates charged by hospitals and other providers.
Recommendations
OSPIRG
recommends the cost containment elements in the Oregon Health Fund Board's
final proposal to the 2009 Legislature be strengthened in the following ways to
further boost savings:
Cut Waste – Consumer Friendly Cost Containment
•
The plan gives people with state-sponsored coverage access to an Integrated
Health Home, the patient-centered primary care model proven to cut costs while
improving health outcomes. OSPIRG recommends all Oregonians have access to this
model of care.
• The plan accelerates usage of
health information technology. OSPIRG recommends Oregon set the strongest possible standards
for privacy and security to protect patients. The shift to electronic records
and networks should be made to result in improved privacy and security over
today's paper systems.
• The plan requires
publicly-sponsored health plan to use Oregon's
drug purchasing pool (OPDP) for prescription drugs unless the health plan can
obtain better prices for consumers using an alternative method. OSPIRG
recommends health plans meet this standard across the board.
• The plan establishes the new
Oregon Health Authority, in part to continue the job of identifying waste in
the system. OSPIRG recommends the Authority also be given the duty to eliminate
the waste it identifies. We also recommend the plan direct the Authority to
develop rules cutting health care advertising and marketing expenses if they
are wasteful and do not result in improved access or quality of care, and to
prevent duplicative capital projects through coordinated local planning.
Unify Purchasing Power
•
OSPIRG recommends that in addition to individuals, small businesses be allowed
to use the Exchange, the new purchasing pool to negotiate lower health care
rates.
Watchdog Health Care Rates
• The plan recommends the
Legislature authorize the Insurance Division to rein in insurance
administrative rates exceeding inflation. OSPIRG recommends Insurance Division
be more specifically directed to evaluate health insurance administrative
costs, and deny unnecessary increases in administrative costs higher than the
rate of inflation.
• In
addition to evaluating the administrative portion of health insurance rates,
OSPIRG recommends the plan strengthen the Insurance Division's evaluation of
proposed rate hikes in their entirety to include an assessment of
affordability. Such evaluation should include factors such as the health
insurance company's investment income, profits, and reserve levels when
determining whether an insurance premium increase is reasonable and necessary.
* Note: Estimated savings due
to health information technology and integrated health homes should not be
added together to obtain a total savings number. Both result in improved use of
evidence-based care which reduces costs, and effectiveness of each depends on
implementation of the other.
|